A small-scale external quality assessment for PCR detection of group B streptococcus in China.

BACKGROUND: Group B streptococcus (GBS) is considered a leading cause of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Molecular diagnosis is a routinely used approach for GBS screening to protect pregnant women and prevent early-onset GBS neonatal disease. The objective of this study was to identify issues and guarantee the dependability of GBS molecular diagnosis by an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme. METHODS: The EQA panel comprised eight samples spiked with 10-fold dilutions of GBS suspension (20-2,000,000 copies/mL), and 2 negative control samples. The panels were coded randomly and distributed to participating laboratories for GBS detection. RESULTS: In total, 44 participating laboratories submitted results with eight commercial GBS PCR assays and one in-house assay. Among them, 36 obtained an acceptable or higher performance score, while 8 required improvement. Among the 440 results returned, 62 (14.1 %) were incorrect, including 5 false positives and 57 false negatives. CONCLUSIONS: Our small-scale EQA showed that most participating laboratories have reliable diagnostic capacities for GBS PCR detection. Nonetheless, further improvements in the detection performance of some laboratories are required, particularly with low-concentration samples. Our survey also reinforces the use of EQA as an essential tool to evaluate the overall proficiency of clinical laboratories.

External quality assessment for the molecular detection of microsatellite instability in China, 2021-2022.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis of tumors informs Lynch syndrome testing, therapeutic choice, and prognosis. The status of MSI is mainly detected by polymerase chain reaction coupled with capillary electrophoresis. However, there are various assays with different detection loci and the obtained results may vary. The objective of this study was to evaluate the concordance among different assays and the performance among different laboratories. METHODS: External quality assessment (EQA) for the detection of MSI was performed in 2021 and 2022. Each sample panel consisted of five samples, including microsatellite-stable and MSI tumor tissues. The sample panels were coded at random, and the returned results were compared and scored. RESULTS: The fully validated sample panels showed appropriate applicability with commercially available assays. There were eight false-negative results in 2021 and five false results (two false-positives and three false-negatives) in 2022. Among the participating laboratories, in 2021, 20 (74.07%) provided completely correct results; in 2022, 38 (92.68%) obtained an optimal score. CONCLUSION: The molecular detection of MSI in China exhibited an improvement in a 2-year EQA study. Participation in EQA program is an efficient way of assessing the performance of laboratories and improving their ability.

External quality assessment for detection of methylated Syndecan 2 (SDC2) in China.

OBJECTIVES: Detection of Syndecan 2 (SDC2) methylation in stool DNA is a novel method for the auxiliary diagnosis of early colorectal cancer (CRC). Currently, this method has been widely applied; however, its accuracy and reliability have not been determined. The objective of this pioneering study was to evaluate the performance of clinical laboratories in China for their ability to detect SDC2 methylation from stool DNA. METHODS: We generated a sample panel consisting of clinical and cell samples. The clinical samples were stool specimens from patients with or without CRC, including four positives (prepared by serial dilution from one stool specimen), one negative and one interferential sample. Two cell samples, with positive or negative methylated SDC2, were used as controls. The panel was distributed to 32 clinical laboratories for analysis of SDC2 methylation, and the results were compared and scored. RESULTS: The sample panel was compatible with commercially available assays and it showed appropriate stability to be an external quality assessment material. There were four false results; one hospital laboratory and one commercial diagnostic laboratory had a false-positive and a false-negative result, respectively, and one commercial diagnostic laboratory had both a false-positive and false-negative result. Among the 32 participating laboratories, 29 (90.62%) obtained an acceptable or better performance score, while 3 (9.38%) laboratories required improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the detection of SDC2 methylation from stool DNA was satisfactory in China. Additionally, the importance of external quality assessment was highlighted for monitoring the performance of clinical laboratories.

External quality assessment for human papillomavirus 16/18 DNA detection and genotyping in Shanghai, China.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection and genotyping is now being used for cervical screening by a growing number of laboratories in Shanghai, but they may have various levels of proficiency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of clinical laboratories for HPV DNA detection and genotyping by an external quality assessment (EQA) program. METHODS: The EQA panels were clinically validated by the Cobas 4800 HPV test, and then distributed to the participating laboratories in May 2015 (round 1) and September 2015 (round 2). Each panel consisted of one negative sample and nine positive cell or clinical samples of HPV16 and HPV18 types at different concentrations. In total, 40 laboratories submitted 18 qualitative and 22 genotyping data sets in round 1 and 44 laboratories submitted 18 qualitative and 26 genotyping data sets in round 2. In both rounds, all laboratories used commercial assays. RESULTS: The negative samples were detected correctly in both rounds by all participating laboratories. There were no false-positive results in the qualitative data sets and only two false-positive results in the genotyping data sets in each of round 1 and round 2. The false-negative rates were 8.0% for round 1 and 2.7% for round 2. For the qualitative data sets, almost all of the laboratories (100% for round 1 and 97.8% for round 2) obtained a score of acceptable or better. For the genotyping results, acceptable or better scores were obtained in 81.8% (round 1) and 100% (round 2). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the majority of laboratories in Shanghai have reliable diagnostic ability for HPV detection and genotyping. Moreover, this study emphasizes the importance of EQA for monitoring the performance of clinical laboratories.